UEFA is Wrong About Football Matches on Armenia, Azerbaijan
UEFA chooses to drop Armenia versus Azerbaijan matches and give the two sides zero focuses. While Armenia needed to play as per UEFA administers and was prepared to have a match in Armenia and travel to Baku for the trade game, Azerbaijan would not have Armenia and travel to Yerevan, consequently conflicting with the set up UEFA rules.
Ordinarily in this kind of a circumstance UEFA rebuffs the side that conflicts with the set up rules. For this situation Armenia and Azerbaijan are rebuffed in an equivalent manner. One inquires as to WHY? How is this?
Armenia is rebuffed with a zero focuses for not consenting to play in an unbiased field. Yerevan needed to play as per the standards of the UEFA game. In the event that UEFA planned to say in the event that Armenia and Azerbaijan fall in a similar gathering we will drop the matches except if they consented to play in an impartial game, it should had done this before the groups were chosen so everybody would know the principles.
Presently, both UEFA and Azerbaijan change rules in the game. This tosses a major shade on the unprejudiced nature and authority or UEFA.
สูตรแทงบอลสูงต่ํา “The UEFA Executive Committee, led by UEFA President Michel Platini, finished its
meeting today early afternoon, at the Abe Lenstra arena in Heerenveen, in front of this evening’s UEFA
European Under-21 Championship Final.
“Likewise explored was the circumstance with respect to the area of the matches to be played between
Armenia and Azerbaijan, in the UEFA EURO 2008(TM) qualifying contest. As no appropriate
bargain could be found between the two affiliations it was chosen to drop the two
matches, specifically Azerbaijan-Armenia planned for 8 September and Armenia-Azerbaijan
plan for 12 September, and to grant the two affiliations zero focuses for the matches.”
Indeed UEFA has the option to drop matches, however just of two gatherings give assent. Armenia has over and over said that it won’t consent to abrogation. Presently the games are dropped with the two players granted zero focuses. As you notice in the citation “As no reasonable
bargain could be found between the two associations…” Suitable trade off??? So in the event that one of the public groups of UEFA needs to disregard the principles of UEFA games the arrangement is to track down an appropriate trade off or to rebuff the violator? I trust the evidence speak for itself.
This isn’t simply and not reasonable. Soccer, sports and legislative issues ought not blend. Indeed Armenia believed that heading out to Bauk and facilitating the National Soccer Team of Azerbaijan could be a kindness signal toward making a commitment to a harmony interaction haggled by the OSCE. UEFA ought to have mulled over this and grant this methodology.